00:00 IST 30°C

Opinion

The airline hired a pilot; the plot hired the airline

The flydubai co-pilot researched airlines before applying and chose one flying to Tel Aviv; a regulator had flagged him in 2024, yet he was hired. Aviation treats pilot vetting as a cost to minimise, and passengers pay the price.

By The Justice news desk

· 2 min read

Flight deck of a Boeing 737-800
The flight deck of a Boeing 737-800. Vetting a pilot is treated as a cost to be minimised, not a life to be protected. (File photo) Photo: Cory W. Watts
Read the interrogation account of the flydubai co-pilot slowly, and a colder story emerges beneath the terror plot. Hamam al-Hammami did not slip through a crack in the system. He walked through the front door, carrying a plan he had drawn up before he ever wore the uniform, and the system waved him in. "I tried to get hired by all the airlines. I checked which ones flew to Tel Aviv. That's why I chose flydubai." He interviewed the industry before the industry interviewed him, and the industry failed the interview. This is the part the aviation business would prefer you skip. Al-Hammami was reportedly barred by Oman's aviation authorities in 2024 over extremist views. A regulator flagged him. And then a commercial airline, hungry for crew in a cut-throat low-cost market, hired him anyway, or hired him without ever finding out. Either version is an indictment: the first is negligence, the second is a vetting regime so hollow that a flagged extremist sails through it. Background checks in commercial aviation are sold to the public as a fortress. In practice they are often a checkbox exercise outsourced to the cheapest bidder, built to satisfy regulators on paper while the hiring machine keeps moving. The cost of a thorough check is measured in weeks and wages; the cost of skipping it was, on September 30, nearly 182 lives over Jordan. Capital did the arithmetic and chose speed. Periyar warned that power which cannot be questioned will always crush those beneath it. Apply that to the modern airline: an industry where the people who decide how carefully a pilot is vetted are the same people whose bonuses depend on filling rosters fast. The passenger is never in that meeting. The crew, like Captain Smit Machchhar, bleeding on the cockpit floor, are never in that meeting either. The aftermath follows the familiar script. Shock, praise for the heroism that contained the damage, promises of review. Then the machine resumes. No executive will face the axe the way Machchhar faced the crash axe. No shareholder will be asked to surrender the savings that cheap vetting delivered. The demand here is not complicated, and it is not about one airline or one country. Crew vetting must be public, auditable, and independent of the hiring airline's commercial pressure. Regulators' flags must follow a pilot across borders and employers, the way a criminal record follows anyone else. Whistleblowers inside airlines who raise doubts about a colleague must be protected, not managed out. Al-Hammami chose his airline with more care than his airline chose him. Until the industry reverses that equation, every passenger is trusting their life to a system that has already shown what it values most. And it is not them.

Sources

Share this story

AMP

Related articles