00:00 IST 32°C

Opinion

The bypoll that shouldn't exist: manufacturing an election out of stolen mandates

Dharapuram and Madurantakam vote on October 6 in bypolls that exist for one reason: three AIADMK MLAs resigned and joined the ruling TVK. When a ruling party can purchase the winners instead of winning seats, the election becomes a receipt.

By The Justice news desk

· 3 min read

The Tamil Nadu legislative assembly-secretariat complex in Chennai
The Tamil Nadu legislative assembly-secretariat complex in Chennai — the house whose seats are being re-contested after engineered defections. File photo. Photo: Prateek Karandikar
On October 6, the voters of Dharapuram and Madurantakam will walk to polling booths for an election that should never have been called. No MLA died. No one was disqualified. The seats fell vacant for the most manufactured reason in Indian democracy: three sitting AIADMK legislators resigned from the Assembly in May — after an election loss — and walked straight into the ruling Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam. Two of them, P. Sathyabama and K. Maragatham Kumaravel, now stand as TVK candidates in the very seats their own resignations vacated. AIADMK general secretary Edappadi Palaniswami said it with unusual plainness on the campaign trail: "Vijay has stolen our MLA. They voted for the AIADMK's two-leaf symbol and elected her." Strip away the partisan anger and the sentence is a precise description of what happened. The voters chose a symbol, a party, a programme. The winner carried that mandate across the aisle like luggage and handed it to the ruling party — which has now staged an entire election, at public expense, to launder the transaction into legitimacy. Consider what a ruling party gains from this method. It does not need to persuade a single voter to switch sides. It needs to persuade one winner. Forty-nine candidates are in the fray across the two seats, thousands of police personnel are being pulled off law-and-order duty for campaign convoys, and crores of public money are being spent — all so that a chief minister can purchase democratic legitimacy for defections his party arranged. The anti-defection law, the Tenth Schedule, was written to punish legislators who cross the floor mid-term. Resign first, join later, and the law waves you through the door it was built to guard. The loophole is not a bug in the strategy; it is the strategy. The deeper injury is to the idea of the mandate itself. A vote is not the personal property of the person who receives it. When Sathyabama won Dharapuram, the mandate belonged to the voters who marked the two-leaf symbol — many of whom would never have voted for the TVK. To resign that seat and re-contest it in new colours is to treat the electorate as an audience for a transfer ceremony, not as the author of the verdict. It tells every voter in Tamil Nadu that their choice is a suggestion, revocable by the very person they chose. Periyar taught that power is a trust held for the people, not a prize to be bought. A government confident of its record does not need to manufacture elections; it wins them. A government that stages bypolls to ratify its own poaching has stopped asking the people and started managing them — and the 2,000-strong police convoy escorting a campaign trip through Coimbatore on a holiday is the image of that management: the state bent into the service of the party's shopping. There is a simple remedy, and the refusal to adopt it is revealing. A legislator who resigns to join another party should be barred from re-contesting for a term — let the seat be fought by fresh faces, not recycled ones. Until that day, every such bypoll should be read for what it is: not a democratic exercise, but a receipt for a purchase. On October 6, the voters of Dharapuram and Madurantakam get to decide whether to sign it.

Sources

Share this story

AMP

Related articles