Reported within a day, recovered nothing: cyber fraud victims say banks look the other way
A survey of cybercrime victims finds most reported fraud to their banks within 24 hours, yet 72 per cent recovered none of their money, amid delays in blocking transfers and reluctance to accept liability.

The call usually comes fast. According to a survey of cybercrime victims, 13 per cent of respondents said they had experienced a cybercrime in the past two to three years, and 54 per cent of victims reported digital financial fraud. Most did what every awareness campaign tells them to do: they approached their banks within 24 hours. What followed, many say, was delay, poor support and a reluctance by banks to accept any liability at all.
The numbers describe a system that responds slowly to a crime that moves in seconds. Among digital financial fraud victims, a majority complained separately to their banks and most reported the fraud within a day. Yet 72 per cent recovered none of the money they lost. Victims described unauthorised transfers that were not blocked in time, helplines that offered little help, and a recurring institutional answer: the customer must have shared something, so the loss is the customer’s own.
Dissatisfaction runs deep on both sides of the complaint. In the survey’s ratings, victims scored their experience with banks at one out of five, and with the police at 2.4 out of five. About one in five fraud victims said they were very dissatisfied with coordination between their bank and the police. The report also recorded victims who said they had paid bribes simply to get a complaint registered, and others who believed their financial data had leaked from inside a bank; the report presents that last point as victims’ belief, not a proven finding.
The damage is not only financial. Interviewed victims and experts described stress, trauma and depression that followed both the theft and the complaints process itself. Experts quoted in the research argue that recovery should not depend on how quickly a frightened customer can navigate a helpline: banks that profit from instant digital payments also own the systems that can freeze money mid-flight, flag mule accounts and share information with police in hours, not weeks.
For now, the burden sits where it has always sat, on the person who lost the money. Until liability rules and response times change, the survey suggests, reporting within a day will remain necessary but nowhere near sufficient.
Sources
Share this story
Related articles

'Hit the streets': Prakash Raj demands SIR be scrapped and the poll chief forced out
Actor-activist Prakash Raj has demanded that the Special Intensive Revision be scrapped, the rolls restored, and Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar be forced to resign and held accountable.
· 2 min read

Stopped on Parliament Street: opposition MPs detained in march for poll chief's exit
Opposition MPs marching to the Election Commission over the voter-roll revision were stopped behind barricades on Parliament Street on Tuesday. Several, including Rahul Gandhi, were briefly detained.
· 2 min read
Before the names are out, the questions grow: ED searches 20 premises in Kerala over ₹92-crore cooperative probe
The Enforcement Directorate searched about 20 premises across Thrissur, Ernakulam and Kozhikode on Wednesday in a probe into alleged irregularities of ₹92 crore in three cooperative societies, officials said. The societies have not been named.
· 2 min read

Election Commission refuses to meet protesting MPs outside its office
The Election Commission said a meeting with protesting opposition MPs outside its premises could not be accepted, offering instead to receive their memorandum through its senior-most officer on duty after an eight-hour dharna in New Delhi.
· 2 min read