00:00 IST 30°C

Opinion

The classroom is on fire: France's students taught the state a lesson it refused to learn

Five hundred closed schools is not a crisis of discipline, it is a verdict on a state that starved its classrooms for years. France's students did what unions and petitions could not: they made the rot visible. Power concedes nothing to petitions; it concedes to refusal.

By The Justice news desk

· 2 min read

Students marching in Paris against the marketisation of education
Representative image: students marching in Paris against the marketisation of education, 2009 Photo: Alexandre Moreau
Five hundred shuttered schools is not a breakdown of discipline. It is a verdict. France's students did not merely protest the state of their schools this week; they issued a judgment on a state that had starved its classrooms for years, and then acted like the hunger was a surprise. Start with the grievances, because they are as unglamorous as they are damning. Dilapidated buildings. Missing teachers. Classes stuffed past every sane limit. These are not demands invented by radicals; they are the repair list any parent would write. The students asked for them for years through every polite channel available, and got nothing. So they blockaded the gates. Periyar would recognise the logic instantly: when the master's house will not fix the roof, you do not write another memorandum to the landlord. You take the roof into your own hands. What makes the French uprising worth more than sympathy is its mechanics. The blockades began in one Paris suburb and spread to 400 schools in a week because every student in France lives inside the same rot. There was no national leader to arrest, no headquarters to raid. The movement's infrastructure is the school gate itself, and the state cannot tear it down without closing the schools it claims to protect. That is why the government's threats fell flat: when the justice minister demands that parents pay for the damage, he is taxing the people his own budgets created. The 5,000 arrests, the 24 torched schools, the 78 injured staff — these are the costs of a decade of deferred maintenance coming due all at once. Notice, too, who arrived to stand beside the lycéens: university students, then firefighters, then public sector workers with their own lists of grievances. That is how a school protest becomes a social movement — not through slogans, but through shared conditions. Anna understood this when he said the people must be made to see that their separate sufferings have one address. The Macron government, busy defending a budget that will starve the schools further, supplied the address. There will be tut-tutting about the violence, and some of it deserves condemnation. But the tut-tutters should answer one question first: who lit the first fire? Not the students. The first fire was lit years ago, in budget after budget, when classrooms were left to crumble and teachers left unhired. The blockades are only the smoke. Power concedes nothing to petitions. It concedes to refusal. France's students have refused to study in ruins, and in refusing, they have done something no white paper ever could: they made the rot visible to everyone, all at once. The lesson for every other country with crumbling schools is sitting right there in the closed gates. Learn it, or burn.

Sources

Share this story

AMP

Related articles

Tamil Nadu assembly election results map
Opinion

The by-election bazaar: defection is now TVK's business model

Opinion: five months after the general election, two MLAs resigned, joined the ruling TVK, and were renominated on its whistle symbol. Dhinakaran wants the ECI to punish serial resigners — right about the symptom. The disease: a seat treated as private property — traded and re-auctioned at will.

· 2 min read