Abetment to suicide: Kerala clears the legal path to prosecute CEC Gyanesh Kumar in 2006 engineer death case
The Keralam government has received a legal opinion that there is no legal bar to prosecuting CEC Gyanesh Kumar for abetment to suicide in the 2006 death of Malaysian engineer Lee See Been. The Home Minister has ordered a fresh Vigilance probe into the case.
The man who oversees India's electoral rolls is now the subject of a legal opinion that says he can be prosecuted for abetment to suicide.
The Keralam government has received legal advice from T. Asaf Ali, the state's Director General of Prosecution, that there is no legal bar in proceeding against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar in a two-decade-old abetment-to-suicide case. The offence, if proven, carries a punishment that can extend to ten years in prison.
The case goes back to 2006, when Kumar was serving as secretary of Kerala's Public Works Department. At the time, a World Bank-aided Kerala State Transport Project was rebuilding the M.C. Road, executed by PATI-BEL, a joint venture between Malaysia's PATI and Bhageeratha Constructions of Kochi. Lee See Been, a Malaysian civil engineer who was the project's chief project officer, died by suicide in Kuala Lumpur in November 2006 after returning from Kerala. A purported suicide note reportedly attributed his death to "extreme mental stress caused following the harassment perpetrated" by Kumar — an allegation that remains unverified and is not a finding of wrongdoing.
The dormant case returned to life on Sunday after Congress activist Malayinkeezhu Venugopal submitted a petition to Home Minister Ramesh Chennithala alleging malpractices and corruption during Kumar's PWD tenure and claiming the original 2006 Vigilance inquiry was derailed by external pressure. Chennithala told ANI he "cannot become a mute spectator" and forwarded the petition to the Vigilance Director for a fresh inquiry — directing the agency to retrieve all 2006 files, examine allegations of interference, and take appropriate legal action.
The timing is explosive. Kumar is already facing sustained opposition pressure over the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls, with three days of protests in Delhi and Mumbai demanding his resignation over alleged mass voter deletions. The Karnataka SIT's 22,000-page charge sheet in the Aland voter-deletion racket has given the protesters' questions institutional weight, and reports that two Election Commissioners recorded objections on electoral-roll management have deepened the crisis of confidence.
The Election Commission has defended the revision exercise and maintained its decisions were unanimous. But a Chief Election Commissioner who must now answer both street protests and a vigilance probe is a Chief Election Commissioner whose authority is visibly fraying.
View full version